Skyrocketing student enrollment is partly to blame for rising college costs

Earlier this month, The Chronicle of Higher Education released an article claiming that student enrollment is partly to blame for rising college costs. I was a little skeptical at first, largely because I’d seen some damning evidence showing that recent state funding cuts were the real culprit. I figured since I have the IPEDS Delta Cost Project Database on hand, I might as well take a look for myself and see what the numbers say. The results were pretty eye-opening.

As many of us know, student enrollment has been steadily rising at universities across the U.S. If you take a look at the graph below, the average 4-year public university has seen a ~25% increase in full-time student enrollment between 2000 and 2010. My alma mater, the University of Central Florida, saw its undergraduate student enrollment spike from 19,781 to 37,609 students in that time period — a 90% increase in only 10 years!

U.S. student enrollment has been skyrocketing in the past decade.

U.S. student enrollment has been skyrocketing in the past decade.

What news outlets typically claim lately is that state funding to these public universities has been steadily declining in the past decade, and that these cuts have been the reason we’ve seen tuition costs rising so rapidly. Their argument isn’t entirely incorrect: The average 4-year public university has had its state funding cut significantly in the past decade, especially since the recession in 2008. Michigan State University saw its state budget cut from about $520 million in 2000 to about $380 million in 2010 — a tremendous cut by anyone’s standards. (Note: dollar amounts were adjusted for inflation to 2014 dollars.)

But if you’ll notice in the chart below, the average 4-year public university is still receiving more state funding in 2010 than it did in the 1990′s when adjusted for inflation. So why can’t these universities get by if they’re actually receiving more state funding than 20 years ago?

U.S. state funding for 4-year public universities has been declining since 2008.

U.S. state funding for 4-year public universities has been steadily declining since 2008.

The answer, of course, is where we started: Student enrollment. If we divide the average 4-year public university’s state funding by its enrollment, we get the chart below. Skyrocketing student enrollment has made it so universities have to teach an ever-increasing number of students with an ever-shrinking budget. What’s worse is that we’re currently at a stage where public universities are receiving the least amount of state funding per student in the past 2+ decades. Faced with the decision to cut spending and deliver lower quality education to more students, or increase tuition and maintain the quality of higher education, it’s no wonder that university administrators chose the latter.

U.S. state funding per student for 4-year public universities has been declining since 2008.

U.S. state funding per student for 4-year public universities has been steadily declining since 2008.

Now, I’d like to reiterate one of my points from my previous posts: College isn’t for everyone.

We’ve been selling too many high school students on this New American Dream: If you work long and hard enough, and if you sacrifice enough, you will eventually graduate college without debt and land your dream job. Instead, students are graduating with an ever-increasing amount of debt and finding it hard to find a job related to their degree. Even worse, by encouraging more and more students to go to college, we’re exacerbating the college debt crisis and making college more expensive for everyone.

Let’s face the facts: You don’t need a college degree to have a successful career nowadays. There are plenty of lucrative careers that don’t even require a Bachelors degree. We need to stop lying to the Millenials by telling them that they need a college degree to get ahead.

Randy is a PhD candidate in Michigan State University's Computer Science program. As a member of Dr. Chris Adami's research lab, he studies biologically-inspired artificial intelligence and evolutionary processes.

Posted in analysis, data visualization Tagged with: , , , , ,
7 comments on “Skyrocketing student enrollment is partly to blame for rising college costs
  1. Rodrigues says:

    I don’t think UCF is a useful touchpoint for this data since it is a school that grew phenomenally for reasons outside of the general increase in enrollment in higher education. I am interested by the data and it does support my belief, like yours, that too many young people are being told that they MUST have a college degree in order for success when the opposite is becoming more and more true; the college degree is becoming both less meaningful and more of a life-long financial burden.

    I wish there were more intermediate education models, though, that could expose young people to the benefits of a basis in writing composition and humanities that lend great perspective and depth to life without the burden of college expense.

  2. georgwalther says:

    Nice figures and write-up but do you not see a problem with the system in place when demand drives up the price of education?
    Seems more like a product the universities sell (Google “grade inflation Harvard” if you like) rather than a public good that every citizen should have the right to obtain.

    • Randy Olson says:

      Indeed, the system isn’t set up perfectly. It obviously wasn’t set up to handle the sudden spike in enrollment that we’ve seen in the past decade. However, it’s a simple fact of the matter that if a university takes on more students, they need the teachers, rooms, etc. to teach them. Perhaps a way around that would be to use technology to make a higher teacher:student ratio feasible, but IMO that also degrades the value of the education because you have less 1-on-1 time with the professors.

  3. Suzanne Dorinski says:

    Interesting. Per pupil expenditures are routinely calculated for PK-12 in the US — see http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/education/cb14-95.html for the current numbers. Perhaps it should also be calculated regularly for universities.

    • Randy Olson says:

      Absolutely it should be! Otherwise we’re potentially misinforming decision makers by not giving them the full picture of the situation.

  4. Tom says:

    Uh yeah, I’m sure those people working at Taco Bell because they didn’t go to college will be thinking “I’ll be a purchasing agent some day. Yay!”

    Maybe it’s time to start chopping professor’s salaries and letting computers do more of the same job that they do.

    • Randy Olson says:

      The average professor salary is actually fairly minuscule for how much they work:

      People have tried to use MOOCs to replace professors for quite some time now. For the most part, MOOCs have failed terribly. Face-to-face instruction is vital for a quality education.

Support this blog

Help support this blog by donating toward its monthly web hosting bill. Running a blog ad-free isn't cheap, so every dollar counts!

Archives

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.